Mouths Full of Blood: Trump and His Backers Spread Lies, Violence and Fascism
![](https://www.uncommonthought.com/mtblog/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Make_America_Hate_Again_sign-345x230.jpg)
[Photo: Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” Puppet at Women’s March on NYC 2017. Shaun Dawson]
By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Truthout
[Photo: Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” Puppet at Women’s March on NYC 2017. Shaun Dawson]
By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Truthout
By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Counterpunch
[Photo: Truth isn’t truth: (Adam Zyglis August 21, 2018).]
By Edward Curtin
Source: EdwardCurin.com
“Deep State” was commonly used in reference to the covert operations of the CIA that were aimed INTERNALLY at the United States. In other words, tools and techniques that the CIA had (has) used to destabilize foreign governments, or promote certain policies in foreign nations were being used to manipulate policy and power within the United States. Donald Trump’s usage of “deep state” seems to be the U.S. government in general, and Curtin’s use appears to refer to the power of corporatism and the boosting of a “power elite” to enhance and maintain power. Curtin also includes the corporate media as at least a foot soldier of the corpo-government deep state.
Edward Curtin uses the animal called “weasel” as an analogy of human weasels. I fear that in describing the furred weasel he slips the balance by applying human motivations and behavior to the weasel and its behavior. Weasles do eat a lot, primarily because they cannot process fat, nor do they store it in their tissues. This forces them to eat a lot, and to eat frequently. They are small and “aggressive”, but they are neither conniving or mean – those are human-driven issues that may apply to human weasels but not the furred one. The meaning of “weasel” when applied to humans actually takes two different forms – noun and verb. As a noun, it is a negative appellation meaning the person is a liar and manipulator, and generally untrustworthy. However, as a verb, it generally means someone who shirks their responsibilities (or promises), often by lying to get out of something. Interestingly, the latter is a common action of trying to get out of something you don’t want to do (work, go to a party, help someone move, etc). I’m not sure where one falls over the line of modest lie to “weasel” . Perhaps frequency?
The above clarifications are not to criticize Edward Curtin’s essay, but to point to something I think is critical: it is vitally important that we increase our awareness of words (and language) and how they are being used. What I am observing on an ever vaster scale is a weaponization (another broad term in the current lexicon) of language to transform the perceptions and understanding of the public (us). People are being led down the rabbit hole as their understanding is shaped to a specific view of events and, the world, the people, an so on. “Witch hunt”. “Hoax”. “Deep State” goes much deeper than Donald Trump’s self-preservation. Commercials about how the oil industry is “green”, and that “outsiders” (non-whites) are dangerous criminals and terrorists, and that belief not only can be separated from fact but that facts are enemies, and prime examples of shaping thinking and percception. Words are important, and so are the pictures they paint on our brains!
[Graphic: Trump in press conference. (Dario Castillejos, Oaxaca, Mexico).]
By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Salon
There are two issues I want to address in introducing Henry A. Giroux’s latest article – abuse, and civil behavior. When Trump announced his candidacy in 2015, I felt a chill. As he got on a roll and his public presentations and rallies got more air time, a growing sense of recognition made me increasingly concerned. I suspect that millions of people were having the same feelings, because Trump (narcissism aside) is a classic abusive personality, and anyone who has been in an abusive relationship recognizes that (consciously or not) in short order. Abusers are a kind of bully, but because they share a certain space and environment over an extended time, and from which it may be difficult to extract oneself (family, intimate relationships, and employment / school come to mind), their influence extends and deepens. Abusers may employ multiple forms of abuse, but all employ emotional abuse. One of the main mechanisms of control is to create an environment where there is constant uncertainty, rapidly changing moods and “rules”. All of this moves the abused into a position of trying to pacify, mollify, and pre-guess the needs of the abuser. All focus is on the abuser, and he (or she) maintains control by the mercurial environment of both emotions and rules. He (or she) is constantly creating their own reality and the abused tries to avoid abuse by hyper-focus on the abuser.
People who have not been abused frequently ask “Why would anybody put up with that?” There are many reasons, but the short answer is that people feel trapped. Frequently the abuser has real power over one’s life and conditions. The process of being abused (particularly in intimate relationships) is a long and progressive one. (This is typically not true in the case of familial child abuse.) Generally, the abuser is charming at the beginning of the relationship, and over time manipulates both the environment and abused. The goal is control, but also to erode the sense of self and sense of value of the abused. Confidence plummets, and uncertainty over day to day life rises. There is an almost constant state of anxiety and because of the hyper focus on the abuser. It becomes increasingly difficult to get enough physical, emotional, and intellectual space to reflect and create options.
With Trump, the majority of the country is suffering personally in the grip of an abusive relationship with the President whose position gives him the full power and force of the United States at his whim.
Turning to “civil” behavior, I have always been bothered by rants about “political correctness” which has largely become a code phrase for whites complaining about having to be polite. They don’t want to feel that they have to watch what they say or do because of concerns about how that might be interpreted by others (anyone not white, heterosexual, Christian – and often, male). These complaints essentially say that someone of high social status should be able to speak and act with no consideration other than their own thoughts and desires. If this seems hauntingly familiar to the above abuse discussion, I would argue they are very much related.
However, civil behavior goes beyond political correctness to normal interactions with others. Politeness and courtesy are the lubricant of social interaction among strangers, acquaintances, and those with whom we are closer. I have heard increasing complaints in the Trump era about the “dishonesty” of politeness, and being “fed up” with being polite. Of course, Trump seems to model a lack of civility virtually every time he opens his mouth (or lets loose his streams of tweets). He also models anger, and striking out at others on a regular basis. All of this is encouraging a similar degradation of civility across the country that is playing out with disturbing regularity on a personal basis. I am seeing this multiple times every time I leave my house so I’m assuming others are as well.
Honest or not, courtesy and basic civility allow people to interact with each other in positive ways. Without it, there are thorns and pit traps everywhere creating not just unpleasant situations, but potentially deadly ones where more folks begin striking out blindly (and lethally) at those around them. It is critical that we become aware of the erosion that is going on and reverse it or this house of cards could go up in flames
[Photo: Faris Odeh, a 15 year old Palestinian was shot an killed by Israeli .soldiers for throwing rocks. (Samer, flickr)]
Ramzy Baroud, PhD