27 September 2023

Mouths Full of Blood: Trump and His Backers Spread Lies, Violence and Fascism

[Photo: Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” Puppet at Women’s March on NYC 2017. Shaun Dawson]

By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Truthout

Editor's Note
There is a wildfire of hatred that is being fueled by Donald Trump and the (former) Republican Party. We got here through a long-term plan of sowing dissent, hopelessness, hatred, and fear of the “other”, and ongoing efforts to tear down major institutions of government, law, and education. Step by step, from Regan forward, a plan to undermine democracy and place us in the hands of oligarchs. Trump became both the figurehead and the tip of the sword in the effort to perform a coup of huge proportions because it is not just about “the peaceful transfer of power” and keeping Trump in office, but about destroying the government and concentrating power.

Continue reading

Category: Henry A. Giroux, Lies Damn Lies - Propaganda, Mechanisms of Contrrol, Pull Right - Fascism, Trump, Violence | Comments Off on Mouths Full of Blood: Trump and His Backers Spread Lies, Violence and Fascism
6 November 2019

Rethinking the Looming Threat of Neoliberal Fascism

Fractured

By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Counterpunch

Editor's Note
Many people, most likely including you since you are reading Uncommon Thought, are stunned by what we see happening around us and to us. The hatred, cruelty, and craven endorsement of fascism and authoritarianism by elected Republicans and a significant swath of Americans leaves me feeling like we have stepped into some dystopian novel of a deformed world. We look to history to inform us about fascism and the devolution of publics into violence, cruelty, and the dehumanization of their neighbors. This examination offers us some clues about what we are experiencing, but since we thought the world had eschewed these horrors, we did little to identify its hallmarks, resisting those processes, or effectively countering the evil lure of nationalism and the cult of personality. If anything we have been even more conditioned into the cult of personality by the endless focus of “celebrities”. It is no accident that we have a B-roll celebrity playing President of the United States.

Continue reading

Category: Extremism, Hate, Henry A. Giroux, History and Patterns, Ideology, Neoliberalism, Pull Right - Fascism, The .01%, Trump | Comments Off on Rethinking the Looming Threat of Neoliberal Fascism
6 March 2019

The Fascinating Spell Cast by Weasels

Truth isn't truth

[Photo: Truth isn’t truth: (Adam Zyglis August 21, 2018).]

By Edward Curtin
Source: EdwardCurin.com

Editor's Note
Words; we are so surrounded by words that we lose the meaning even while they shape our thoughts, perceptions, and behavior. Specific words and terms may have little or no meaning to many people, but because of the tone or context in which they are often heard, they take on more of a feeling than a meaning. One of those terms, frequently used in the following essay, is “Deep State.” This is also a frequent refrain of Donald J. Trump. Are Edward Cutin and Donald Trump referring to the same thing, or meaning the same thing in their use of “Deep State”? Do most people even know what “Deep State” originally (and commonly) meant? The answer to both of these questions is likely “No”.

“Deep State” was commonly used in reference to the covert operations of the CIA that were aimed INTERNALLY at the United States. In other words, tools and techniques that the CIA had (has) used to destabilize foreign governments, or promote certain policies in foreign nations were being used to manipulate policy and power within the United States. Donald Trump’s usage of “deep state” seems to be the U.S. government in general, and Curtin’s use appears to refer to the power of corporatism and the boosting of a “power elite”  to enhance and maintain power. Curtin also includes the corporate media as at least a foot soldier of the corpo-government deep state.

Edward Curtin uses the animal called “weasel” as an analogy of human weasels. I fear that in describing the furred weasel he slips the balance by applying human motivations and behavior to the weasel  and its behavior. Weasles do eat a lot, primarily because they cannot process fat, nor do they store it in their tissues. This forces them to eat a lot, and to eat frequently. They are small and “aggressive”, but they are neither conniving or mean – those are human-driven issues that may apply to human weasels but not the furred one. The meaning of “weasel” when applied to humans actually takes two different forms – noun and verb. As a noun, it is a negative appellation meaning the person is a liar and manipulator, and generally untrustworthy. However, as a verb, it generally means someone who shirks their responsibilities (or promises), often by lying to get out of something. Interestingly, the latter is a common action of trying to get out of something you don’t want to do (work, go to a party, help someone move, etc). I’m not sure where one falls over the line of modest lie to “weasel” . Perhaps frequency?

The above clarifications are not to criticize Edward Curtin’s essay, but to point to something I think is critical: it is vitally important that we increase our awareness of words (and language) and how they are being used. What I am observing on an ever vaster scale is a weaponization (another broad term in the current lexicon) of language to transform the perceptions and understanding of the public (us). People are being led down the rabbit hole as their understanding is shaped to a specific view of events and, the world, the people, an so on. “Witch hunt”. “Hoax”. “Deep State” goes much deeper than Donald Trump’s self-preservation. Commercials about how the oil industry is “green”, and that “outsiders” (non-whites) are dangerous criminals and terrorists, and that belief not only can be separated from fact but that facts are enemies, and prime examples of shaping thinking and percception. Words are important, and so are the pictures they paint on our brains!

Continue reading

Category: Covert Ops, Edward Curtin, Government, Lies Damn Lies - Propaganda, Mechanisms of Contrrol, Media, Trump | Comments Off on The Fascinating Spell Cast by Weasels
18 November 2018

Donald Trump’s fascist politics and the language of disappearance

Trump in press conference

[Graphic: Trump in press conference. (Dario Castillejos, Oaxaca, Mexico).]

By: Henry A. Giroux
Source: Salon

Trump’s language seems buffoonish, but he’s no clown. His rhetoric is meant to destroy thought and democracy

Editor's Note
It is difficult to tell whether Trump is a naturally destructive sociopath empowered first by wealth and now the presidency, or whether he is an evil genius. I tend towards the former, but I believe that he has discovered democracy and sees it as an enemy to his interests and desires. What is happening to our country – politically, socially, and ethically – is clear. How it is happening is so present and close that it is difficult to get perspective. Intent remains a question mark (at least to me).

There are two issues I want to address in introducing Henry A. Giroux’s latest article – abuse, and civil behavior. When Trump announced his candidacy in 2015, I felt a chill. As he got on a roll and his public presentations and rallies got more air time, a growing sense of recognition made me increasingly concerned. I suspect that millions of people were having the same feelings, because Trump (narcissism aside) is a classic abusive personality, and anyone who has been in an abusive relationship recognizes that (consciously or not) in short order. Abusers are a kind of bully, but because they share a certain space and environment over an extended time, and from which it may be difficult to extract oneself (family, intimate relationships, and employment / school come to mind), their influence extends and deepens. Abusers may employ multiple forms of abuse, but all employ emotional abuse. One of the main mechanisms of control is to create an environment where there is constant uncertainty, rapidly changing moods and “rules”. All of this moves the abused into a position of trying to pacify, mollify, and pre-guess the needs of the abuser. All focus is on the abuser, and he (or she) maintains control by the mercurial environment of both emotions and rules. He (or she) is constantly creating their own reality and the abused tries to avoid abuse by hyper-focus on the abuser.

People who have not been abused frequently ask “Why would anybody put up with that?” There are many reasons, but the short answer is that people feel trapped. Frequently the abuser has real power over one’s life and conditions. The process of being abused (particularly in intimate relationships) is a long and progressive one. (This is typically not true in the case of familial child abuse.) Generally, the abuser is charming at the beginning of the relationship, and over time manipulates both the environment and abused. The goal is control, but also to erode the sense of self and sense of value of the abused. Confidence plummets, and uncertainty over day to day life rises. There is an almost constant state of anxiety and because of the hyper focus on the abuser. It becomes increasingly difficult to get enough physical, emotional, and intellectual space to reflect and create options.

With Trump, the majority of the country is suffering personally in the grip of an abusive relationship with the President whose position gives him the full power and force of the United States at his whim.

Turning to “civil” behavior, I have always been bothered by rants about “political correctness” which has largely become a code phrase for whites complaining about having to be polite. They don’t want to feel that they have to watch what they say or do because of concerns about how that might be interpreted by others (anyone not white, heterosexual, Christian – and often, male). These complaints essentially say that someone of high social status should be able to speak and act with no consideration other than their own thoughts and desires. If this seems hauntingly familiar to the above abuse discussion, I would argue they are very much related.

However, civil behavior goes beyond political correctness to normal interactions with others. Politeness and courtesy are the lubricant of social interaction among strangers, acquaintances, and those with whom we are closer. I have heard increasing complaints in the Trump era about the “dishonesty” of politeness, and being “fed up” with being polite. Of course, Trump seems to model a lack of civility virtually every time he opens his mouth (or lets loose his streams of tweets). He also models anger, and striking out at others on a regular basis. All of this is encouraging a similar degradation of civility across the country that is playing out with disturbing regularity on a personal basis. I am seeing this multiple times every time I leave my house so I’m assuming others are as well.

Honest or not, courtesy and basic civility allow people to interact with each other in positive ways. Without it, there are thorns and pit traps everywhere creating not just unpleasant situations, but potentially deadly ones where more folks begin striking out blindly (and lethally) at those around them. It is critical that we become aware of the erosion that is going on and reverse it or this house of cards could go up in flames

Continue reading

Category: Culture, Henry A. Giroux, Pull Right - Fascism, Trump, Violence | Comments Off on Donald Trump’s fascist politics and the language of disappearance
14 June 2018

Ambiguous Terminologies

Palestinian attack on Israel

[Photo: Faris Odeh, a 15 year old Palestinian was shot an killed by Israeli .soldiers for throwing rocks. (Samer, flickr)]

Ramzy Baroud, PhD

Editor's Note
What is in a word? Everything. We can think of language as incredibly loose and over broad, but the real truth is that words matter greatly because the meanings convey certain contexts and relationships. For example, a bully comes up and beats the crap out of an unresisting classmate. The incident may be reported as a “fight”. However, fight requires at least two combatants exchanging verbal and/or physical blows. If just one person is engaging in aggression, it is an attack and not a fight. On the public stage, words are very carefully chosen to convey certain messages and one could call this the heart of “propaganda”. Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky co-wrote a book titled “Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media” that goes in depth into the manipulation of public opinion. We can look at decades of reporting and political speeches on the “conflict” between Israel and Palestine. On a weekly basis one is likely to hear that “Israel has the right _____”. Can you finish the sentence? My guess is that easily 80% of the adult population of the US can accurately finish that sentence with “to defend itself.” It is an unquestioned and very frequently repeated justification of Israel’s military, police, and policy actions aimed at controlling the Palestinian population. The repeated presentation of any set perspective leads to an unthinking assumption that it is not a perspective or “slant” but an unquestioned truth. Words used to create a belief – propaganda or brainwashing or “simple” bias?

Continue reading

Category: Bear Witness, Israel, Lies Damn Lies - Propaganda, Mechanisms of Contrrol, Media, Palestine, Ramzy Baroud | Comments Off on Ambiguous Terminologies